31 January 2007
For A.J.
Remember when Mr. Consonery mentioned "that tourist trap on I-95", and then I stated amusement at the statement, "You never sausage a place"?
And remember how you and Tara were confused? And remember how Nick and I tried to explain the aforementioned tourist trap to you? And remember how you probably don't care anymore, but I still wanted to show you the billboard?
Yeah, those were good times.
27 January 2007
The Blink-off '07
Dick Cheney vs. Nancy Pelosi
Either Nancy Pelosi is actually a robot who engages in excessive blinking when she hears stuff she doesn't like, or Dick Cheney is a robot whose blinking protocols are malfunctioning. Both are possible, actually.
Either Nancy Pelosi is actually a robot who engages in excessive blinking when she hears stuff she doesn't like, or Dick Cheney is a robot whose blinking protocols are malfunctioning. Both are possible, actually.
20 January 2007
Did the President just kill Habeas Corpus?: an update
Remember when I told you that the Bush Administration suspended habeas corpus? Well, the Attorney General just gave the rationale for that "suspension," and according to him, the American people never really had habeas corpus to begin with.
You see, in response to questioning from Senator Arlen Specter during the recent Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, U.S. Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales, filled us on in on the writ of habeas corpus:
Gonzales: "There is no expressed grant of habeas in the Constitution; there’s a prohibition against taking it away..."
Specter: "Wait a minute, the Constitution says you can’t take it away except in case of rebellion or invasion. Doesn’t that mean you have the right of habeas corpus unless there’s a rebellion or invasion?
Gonzales: "The Constitution doesn’t say every individual in the United States or citizen is hereby granted or assured the right of habeas corpus. It doesn’t say that. It simply says 'the right shall not be suspended' except in cases of rebellion or invasion."
Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you our top federal lawyer, a man who says that if the Constitution doesn't explicitly state that a right does exist, then that right doesn't really exist in the first place. As Consortiumnews.com notes, "applying Gonzales’s reasoning, one could argue that the First Amendment doesn’t explicitly say Americans have the right to worship as they choose, speak as they wish or assemble peacefully. The amendment simply bars the government, i.e. Congress, from passing laws that would impinge on these rights."
While no one is saying that the administration is currently planning on restricting freedom of speech, religion, peacefully assemble, etc, the suspension of habeas corpus sets a scary precedent. Don't get me wrong, I'm certainly in support of protecting America from those who want to harm it, but the methods and logic used by the administration to protect us gives me pause--and a little concern for our future.
You see, in response to questioning from Senator Arlen Specter during the recent Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, U.S. Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales, filled us on in on the writ of habeas corpus:
Gonzales: "There is no expressed grant of habeas in the Constitution; there’s a prohibition against taking it away..."
Specter: "Wait a minute, the Constitution says you can’t take it away except in case of rebellion or invasion. Doesn’t that mean you have the right of habeas corpus unless there’s a rebellion or invasion?
Gonzales: "The Constitution doesn’t say every individual in the United States or citizen is hereby granted or assured the right of habeas corpus. It doesn’t say that. It simply says 'the right shall not be suspended' except in cases of rebellion or invasion."
Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you our top federal lawyer, a man who says that if the Constitution doesn't explicitly state that a right does exist, then that right doesn't really exist in the first place. As Consortiumnews.com notes, "applying Gonzales’s reasoning, one could argue that the First Amendment doesn’t explicitly say Americans have the right to worship as they choose, speak as they wish or assemble peacefully. The amendment simply bars the government, i.e. Congress, from passing laws that would impinge on these rights."
While no one is saying that the administration is currently planning on restricting freedom of speech, religion, peacefully assemble, etc, the suspension of habeas corpus sets a scary precedent. Don't get me wrong, I'm certainly in support of protecting America from those who want to harm it, but the methods and logic used by the administration to protect us gives me pause--and a little concern for our future.
18 January 2007
Gaia tries to get our attention
The above is an aerial shot of (as Towleroad has put it) "roads and cleared land caused by loggers and their trucks and machinery in southern Sweden. The pattern they've caused in the destruction has come to illustrate the very thing they have destroyed."
I must say, it's quite an eerie coincidence. It's almost as if the Earth itself is trying to tell us something. Hmmm.
(Plus, not only is it eerie, but it's a pretty cool coincidence as well. And, it's far more intriguing than those people who see the Virgin Mary in their applesauce.)
10 January 2007
The Simpsons: Anime style
I love this: the characters you know and love, all distorted and quasi-demonic.
Anime's gravity-defying hair styles have always intrigued me, thus I love that Lisa's hair looks like it could kill if you get too close. Krusty re-awakens anyone's clown paranoia. Mr. Flanders looks gayer than Smithers (which makes sense, kinda), Marge looks oddly ditsy (which makes kinda no sense at all), and Mr. Burns looks older than Methuselah (which really makes sense).
Meanwhile, Otto is a bit vampire-ish, and Sherri & Terri (the purple-haired twins) look downright creppy (kinda "The Ring" meets that stupid Sarah-Michelle Geller movie I never saw).
Big props to TVgasm for leading me to this, and much accolades to the artist for her gorgeous work. If you're interested, here's the original picture and the characters of Futurama in a similar anime style.
(why do I feel like this post is breaking some copyright law somewhere? Ha.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)